wen

🔍

question:You are an AI assistant. User will you give you a task. Your goal is to complete the task as faithfully as you can. While performing the task think step-by-step and justify your steps. By. Daily Mail Reporter and Associated Press Reporter. PUBLISHED:. 18:02 EST, 30 October 2013. |. UPDATED:. 18:29 EST, 30 October 2013. A long-lost Orson Welles film has finally had its U.S. premiere some 75 years after the unfinished silent movie was produced by the cinema genius. Too Much Johnson, which pre-dates his masterpiece debut Orson Welles, was recently discovered in an Italian warehouse and had its first ever American screening in Rochester, New York on October 16. The. film was supposed to accompany a stage production of a William Gillette. play and stars Joseph Cotten - who was to collaborate with Welles again. in the 1941 Citizen Kane and again in 1949's The Third Man. The play opened without the film in August 1938 and flopped. Scroll down for video. Welles made the silent slapstick comedy in New York City shortly before heading to Hollywood to film Citizen Kane, considered by many critics to be the best movie ever made. Welles died in 1985 and believed that the only remaining copy of the film had burned up in a 1970 fire that had destroyed his home in Spain. The U.S. screening took place at the Dryden Theater at the George Eastman House, where experts restored the 35 mm nitrate work print of the film. The U.S. screening took place at the Dryden Theater at the George Eastman House, where experts restored the 35 mm nitrate work print of the film. Italian film archivists announced in August that a copy of 'Too Much Johnson originally believed destroyed in a fire had been found in a box by a shipping company in Pordenone, a northeastern Italian city that's home to the Le Giornate del Cinema Muto silent film festival where the film had it global premier earlier this month. The film was turned over to a local film society, but the find seemed of no particular value and was left unopened for many years. Circo Giorgini, an Italian expert on Welles, identified the film about three years ago. The only remaining copy was believed to have been burned up in a 1970 fire that destroyed Welles' home in Madrid, Spain. Welles died in 1985. How the film arrived in Pordenone remains a mystery. The film was supposed to accompany a stage production of a William Gillette play, but the play opened without the film in August 1938 and flopped. Film accompaniment: Orson Welles wanted his 40-minute, three-act film to be prologues for the three acts of a William Gillette play he was putting on at the Mercury Theater. 'This is by far the most important film restoration by George Eastman House in a very long time,' said Paolo Cherchi Usai, senior curator of film, who supervised the project. 'Holding in one's hands the very same print that had been personally edited by Orson Welles 75 years ago provokes an emotion that's just impossible to describe.' Welles made the silent slapstick comedy in New York City shortly before heading to Hollywood to film Citizen Kane, considered by many critics to be the best movie ever made. Too Much Johnson, filmed in 1938, has nowhere near the complexity of Kane or the tense thrills of The Third Man but offers a never-before-seen glimpse at the skills of one of cinema's greats. It had never been shown in public and. was at one time lost to Welles himself, who expressed his shock at. finding a copy in storage at his home near Madrid, Spain. It. was this copy of the film, which most experts agreed was the only copy,. that was destroyed in a fire at Welles's home in the 1970s. The film was designed to run for 40 minutes, with 20 minutes devoted to the play's prologue and two 10-minute introductions for the second and third act. But a virtually pristine print was recently discovered in an Italian warehouse, and has now been restored by George Eastman House. The film was not intended to stand by. itself, but was designed as the cinematic aspect of Welles's Mercury. Theater stage presentation of William Gillette's 1894 comedy. The play follows the fortunes of a New. York playboy who flees from the violent husband of his mistress and. borrows the identity of a plantation owner in Cuba - who is expecting the. arrival of a mail-order bride. The film was designed to run for 40 minutes, with. 20 minutes devoted to the play's prologue and two 10-minute. introductions for the second and third act. Welles wanted it to be a. silent film in the tradition of the Mack Sennett slapstick comedies, in. order to enhance the various chases, duels and comic conflicts of the. Gillette play. In addition - and typical of Welles's innovation - live music and live sound effects would be synchronized with the footage to provide a 'surround sound' effect for the audience. But the film was never fully. finished. It was anticipated that the play would be a flop and Welles. let the film project die a natural death, putting the footage in. storage. He recalled in a. later interview that he was surprised to find a copy at his home,. saying: 'I can't remember whether I had it all along and dug it out of. the bottom of a trunk, or whether someone brought it to me, but there it. was. Long-time collaboration: The unseen film stars Joseph Cotten - seen here with Welles in 1949's The Third Man. Welles himself said Cotten's performance was amazing, but nonetheless did not want the film shown publicly. Masterpiece: Citizen Kane - the 1941 film written, directed by and starring Orson Welles - is widely regarded as the best film ever made. 'I screened it, and it was in perfect. condition, with not a scratch on it, as though it had only been through. a projector once or twice before. It had a fine quality. 'Cotten was magnificent, and I immediately made plans to edit it and send it to Joe as a birthday present.'. But Welles never allowed the footage to be seen publicly, stating the film would not make sense outside of the full context of the Gillette play. The recent copy was found in a warehouse by the staff of Pordenone arthouse Cinemazero. Other Mercury Theater actors that appear in the film include Eustace Wyatt, Edgar Barrier, Ruth Ford, Arlene Francis, Mary Wickes, Welles himself and his wife Virginia Nicholson. The play opened without the film on August 16, 1938 - and flopped. The unfinished nitrate work print was given by Cinemazero to Italian film archive Cineteca del Friuli, which transferred it to George Eastman House to be preserved with a grant from the National Film Preservation Foundation. Paolo Cherchi Usai, senior curator of film, who supervised the project for George Eastman House, said: 'This is by far the most important film restoration by George Eastman House in a very long time. Holding in one’s hands the very same print that had been personally edited by Orson Welles 75 years ago provokes an emotion that’s just impossible to describe.' Despite the fact that it pre-dates Citizen Kane, even Too Much Johnson is not Welles's directorial debut. In 1934, while still attending The Todd School for. Boys, he co-directed (with friend William Vance) a short avant garde. film called The Hearts Of Age. Here is a summary of the highlights for this article:

answer:1. Orson Welles's long-lost silent film, "Too Much Johnson," was discovered in an Italian warehouse and had its U.S. premiere in Rochester, New York on October 16, 2013. 2. The film stars Joseph Cotten and was intended to accompany a stage production of a William Gillette play but never had its chance in 1938 when the play flopped. 3. Welles believed that the only remaining copy of the film had been destroyed in a fire in 1970, so the discovery of the Italian print in 2013 was a surprise. 4. The film was found in Pordenone, Italy, where it had been unopened for many years. An Italian film expert identified the film about three years before the premiere. 5. Experts restored the 35 mm nitrate work print of the film at George Eastman House, and it was screened at the Dryden Theater. 6. "Too Much Johnson" offers a previously unseen look at the skills of one of cinema's greats, but it was not intended to stand alone as a complete film. 7. The U.S. premiere is considered one of the most important film restorations by George Eastman House, according to Paolo Cherchi Usai, senior curator of film.,A long-lost Orson Welles film, "Too Much Johnson," has finally had its U.S. premiere 75 years after the unfinished silent movie was produced. The film was recently discovered in an Italian warehouse and had its first-ever American screening in Rochester, New York. It was initially intended to be a part of a stage production of a William Gillette play and starred Joseph Cotten, who would go on to collaborate with Welles in "Citizen Kane" and "The Third Man." The film, believed to be destroyed in a 1970 fire at Welles' home in Spain, was restored by the George Eastman House and offers a glimpse of Welles' cinematic abilities., * A lost Orson Welles film, "Too Much Johnson," has been discovered in an Italian warehouse and had its U.S. premiere in Rochester, New York. * The silent slapstick comedy was made in 1938 and was intended to accompany a stage production of a William Gillette play. * The play opened without the film and flopped, and Welles believed that the only remaining copy of the film had burned in a fire. * The restoration of the film was done by the George Eastman House, and the U.S. screening took place at the Dryden Theater. * The only remaining copy of the film was believed to have been destroyed in a fire in Spain in the 1970s, but it was found in Pordenone, Italy. * The film was made as a prologue for the three acts of the play and was designed to be a silent film in the style of Mack Sennett slapstick comedies. Here are the steps I would take to complete the task of summarizing the article: 1. Identify the main topic of the article: The discovery and premiere of a lost Orson Welles film 2. Determine the important details of the article: the name of the film, the year it was made, its intended use, the fact that it was considered lost, the location it was found, and its restoration and premiere. 3. Identify any additional relevant information: The fact that the film was a silent slapstick comedy, the play it was intended to accompany, and the reason for its failure. 4. Use the important details and additional information to write a concise summary of the article.

question:You are an AI assistant. Provide a detailed answer so user don’t need to search outside to understand the answer. Definition: In this task, you are given a list. This list contains many lists of integers. The list is several items written within a . Your task is to find the maximum number among the members of each inner list. The output should be a list comprised of the maximums with the same order as the internal lists. Input: -50, -134, 14, 92, -52, -36, -95, -84, 93, -92, -180, -51, 80, 14, -45, 79, -13, -116, 0, -105, -180, -105, -199, -17, -188, 38, -62, -39, -83, 46, -156, -164, 48, -153, -99, -62, -148, 81, -158, -12, 37 Output:

answer:To find the maximum number among the members of each inner list, you should go through each inner list and find the maximum number. Here is the step-by-step process: 1. **First inner list:** `-50, -134`. The maximum number is `-50`. 2. **Second inner list:** `14, 92`. The maximum number is `92`. 3. **Third inner list:** `-52, -36, -95, -84, 93, -92`. The maximum number is `93`. 4. **Fourth inner list:** `-180, -51, 80, 14, -45, 79`. The maximum number is `80`. 5. **Fifth inner list:** `-13, -116, 0`. The maximum number is `0`. 6. **Sixth inner list:** `-105, -180, -105, -199, -17, -188, 38`. The maximum number is `38`. 7. **Seventh inner list:** `-62, -39, -83, 46`. The maximum number is `46`. 8. **Eighth inner list:** `-156, -164, 48, -153`. The maximum number is `48`. 9. **Ninth inner list:** `-99, -62, -148, 81, -158, -12, 37`. The maximum number is `81`. So, the output should be: `-50, 92, 93, 80, 0, 38, 46, 48, 81`.,-50, 92, 93, 80, 0, 38, 46, 48, 81,To find the maximum number among the members of each inner list in the given input, we must traverse each inner list and compare its elements to find the maximum. Then, we create a new list with these maximum numbers, following the same order as the original input. Here's a detailed explanation for each inner list: 1. -50, -134: Here, -50 is the maximum number, so we'll add it to our output list. Output: -50 2. 14, 92: In this list, 92 is the maximum number. Add it to our output list followed by -50. Output: -50, 92 3. -52, -36, -95, -84, 93, -92: The maximum number in this list is 93. Add it to our output list and append it after 92. Output: -50, 92, 93 4. -180, -51, 80, 14, -45, 79: The maximum number in this list is 80. Add it to our output list and append it after 93. Output: -50, 92, 93, 80 5. -13, -116, 0: In this list, 0 is the maximum number. Add it to our output list and append it after 80. Output: -50, 92, 93, 80, 0 6. -105, -180, -105, -199, -17, -188, 38: In this list, 38 is the maximum number. Add it to our output list after 0. Output: -50, 92, 93, 80, 0, 38 7. -62, -39, -83, 46: The maximum number in this list is 46. Add it to our output list after 38. Output: -50, 92, 93, 80, 0, 38, 46 8. -156, -164, 48, -153: In this list, 48 is the maximum number. Add it to our output list after 46. Output: -50, 92, 93, 80, 0, 38, 46, 48 9. -99, -62, -148, 81, -158, -12, 37: In this list, 81 is the maximum number. Add it to our output list after 48. Output: -50, 92, 93, 80, 0, 38, 46, 48, 81 Therefore, the final answer is -50, 92, 93, 80, 0, 38, 46, 48, 81.

question:You are a helpful assistant, who always provide explanation. Think like you are answering to a five year old. Does the following review have a positive or negative opinion of the movie? a film with contemporary political resonance Pick from: (a). negative; (b). positive;

answer:This review has a (b). positive opinion of the movie. The phrase "contemporary political resonance" means that the movie relates to current events and political issues, which could be good because it is relevant and interesting for the audience., (b). positive; I think the phrase "a film with contemporary political resonance" is a good thing! It means that the movie has ideas and stories that are related to the politics of today and might make people think about what's happening in the world right now. This can help create interesting discussions and reflections. So, in this case, the review probably has a positive opinion of the movie.,This review has a (b). positive opinion of the movie because it mentions "contemporary political resonance," which means the movie has a connection to current political issues, making it interesting and relevant.

question:You are a helpful assistant, who always provide explanation. Think like you are answering to a five year old. Concepts: cheese, foil, pizza, sauce Write a sentence that includes all these words.

answer:Sure, I'd be happy to explain these concepts in a simple way! Here's a sentence that includes all of them: "We can make a yummy pizza by spreading pizza sauce on a fluffy dough, adding some shredded cheese on top, and then wrapping it all up in foil to bake in the oven until it's warm and melty!",We can wrap cheese with foil, and then pour sauce on top of them to make delicious pizza for a yummy meal!,When you make a delicious pizza, you put sauce and cheese on the dough, and sometimes, you can put the pizza on foil in the oven to keep it from getting too messy.