answer:The main points of the article are: 1. British Prime Minister David Cameron has announced an "aspiration" for the UK to have the highest percentage of people in work among developed nations, overtaking Germany's current rate of 74%. 2. The goal, which does not have a specified timescale, is being referred to as "full employment" and involves ensuring that anyone who wants a job is able to get one in the UK. 3. Cameron made the announcement in Ipswich while outlining Conservative manifesto pledges on employment and enterprise, including an increase in start-up loans offered by the government and investment in infrastructure to attract businesses. 4. The Conservative government also aims to create three million new apprenticeships to increase employment opportunities for young people. 5. The opposition Labour Party criticized the announcement, stating that the Conservatives' promises would sound like "empty words" to the unemployed or those on low pay, and that average wages have fallen by £1,600 per year under the Conservative government. 6. The Trade Union Congress and the British Chambers of Commerce both welcomed the goal of full employment, but emphasized the need for creating decent jobs with good pay and prospects, and ensuring that Britain's businesses are thriving. 7. Cameron acknowledged the challenges the UK has faced in recent years, including failing to meet its target for reducing net migration, but pledged to implement the "toughest possible welfare controls" on people coming from the EU.,The article discusses the British Prime Minister, David Cameron's ambition for Britain to achieve the highest percentage of people in work of any developed nation, overtaking Germany. In a speech in Ipswich, Cameron announced Conservative manifesto pledges on employment and enterprise, such as increasing the number of start-up loans provided by the government and pledging investment in infrastructure to attract businesses, creating three million new apprenticeships, and providing tougher welfare controls on people coming from the European Union. However, opposition from Labour claims that these promises sound like "empty words" to the unemployed or those on low pay, referring to the £1,600 drop in average wages and the rise in people being paid under the living wage. The Trades' Union Congress (TUC) general secretary also endorses full employment but stresses the necessity for decent jobs with good pay and prospects. John Longworth of the British Chambers of Commerce agrees that full employment is an important goal, but emphasizes that it relies on British businesses being productive.,Prime Minister David Cameron aims for Britain to have the highest percentage of people in work of any developed nation, surpassing Germany's 74% employment rate, with the UK currently at 72%. This goal of "full employment" denotes that anyone who wants a job in the UK will be able to get one. To achieve this, Cameron outlined Conservative manifesto pledges on employment and enterprise, including an increase to 75,000 in the number of start-up loans provided by the government in the next parliament, investment in infrastructure to attract businesses, and creating three million new apprenticeships. Opposition Labour party critiques argue that the promises sound like "empty words" to the unemployed and those on low pay, stating that average wages have decreased and the number of people making less than a living wage has increased.

answer:ParkScore is a ranking system created by The Trust for Public Land to evaluate and compare the park systems of the 50 largest US cities. The unique formula used by ParkScore seeks to measure the overall quality and accessibility of a city's park system, taking into account the following five factors: 1. Median park size: This refers to the median size of parks within the city. A larger median park size often indicates that a city's parks offer more open space and opportunities for various recreational activities. 2. Park acres as a percent of city area: This metric measures the total size of a city's park system relative to the city's total area. A higher percentage indicates that a greater portion of the city is allocated to parks, potentially leading to better air quality, stormwater management, and opportunities for nature exploration. 3. Percent of city residents within a half-mile of a park: This factor assesses how many residents have easy access to parks, with a half-mile distance (approximately a 10-minute walk) considered a reasonable walking distance. A higher percentage indicates better park accessibility for city residents. 4. Spending on park services per resident: This measures the amount of money a city invests in its park system per resident. Higher spending can lead to better park maintenance, more programming, and additional amenities, contributing to a higher-quality park experience. 5. Number of playgrounds per 10,000 residents: This factor focuses on the availability of playgrounds, which are essential recreational spaces for children. A higher number of playgrounds per capita indicates a better opportunity for physical activity and social interaction for young residents. In the 2013 ParkScore ranking, New York City finished second, behind Minneapolis, based on these five factors.,ParkScore's unique formula seeks to measure the quality and accessibility of urban park systems. It analyzes five factors in its ranking process: median park size, park acres as a percentage of city area, the percentage of city residents within a half-mile of a park, spending of park services per resident, and the number of playgrounds per 10,000 residents. These factors are used to assess the effectiveness and overall satisfaction of parks in cities, helping to identify areas for improvement and prioritize investments in green space.,ParkScore's unique formula seeks to measure the quality and accessibility of urban park systems. It does so by analyzing the following factors: 1. Median park size: The average size of parks in a city, which indicates the availability of large green spaces for recreation and relaxation. 2. Park acres as a percent of city area: This shows the proportion of a city's land dedicated to parks and green spaces. 3. The percent of city residents within a half-mile of a park: This measures the accessibility of parks for residents, showing how many people have a park within walking distance of their homes. 4. Spending on park services per resident: This indicates the financial investment that a city makes in its parks, which can impact the quality and maintenance of those spaces. 5. The number of playgrounds per 10,000 residents: This measures the prevalence of recreational facilities for children within a city's park system. By considering these factors, ParkScore aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of a city's park system, taking into account not just the quantity of parks but also their quality and accessibility to residents.

answer:The Foundry, Kate visits The Foundry club in New York. This is where she finds a job and an apartment after being rejected by the American Ballet Academy.,Kate visits The Foundry club in New York City.

answer:This review is a detailed and long analysis of a movie that the reviewer clearly disliked, making it 1. negative. The review highlights various aspects, such as acting, writing, direction, and editing, that the reviewer found to be negative. In particular, the reviewer criticized the music made by two directors, stating that there is music in every frame of the movie. Additionally, the reviewer expresses sympathy for the actors Robert Wagner and Tom Bosley, referring to the roles as being at the twilight of their careers. The reviewer ends the critique by indicating that it is at the viewer's own risk if they decide to watch the movie. The nature of this review is undoubtedly negative.,This review is negative. The reviewer clearly expresses their dissatisfaction with almost every aspect of the movie - acting, writing, direction, editing, and especially the music. They mention that the film has two composers, which they believe contributes to the excessive and unpleasant use of music throughout the movie. Using phrases like "absolute worst," "D movie style drivel," and "painful to listen to" further emphasize their negative experience. The reviewer also mentions feeling sorry for actors Robert Wagner and Tom Bosley, who they presume did not expect to be in such roles towards the end of their careers. The reviewer even goes so far as to warn potential viewers by stating, "See it at your own risk." These comments all indicate that the reviewer had a negative experience watching the film and would not recommend it to others. In summary, this review is 1: Negative. It provides a detailed, though unfavorable, insight into the various aspects of the film, focusing specifically on the overuse and poor quality of music. The reviewer's disappointment with the movie is evident throughout their review, and their warning for potential viewers further emphasizes their negative opinion of the film., The review is decidedly negative. The reviewer expresses strong criticism towards various aspects of the movie, including the acting, writing, direction, editing, and music. They describe the music as particularly egregious, with an excessive and poorly executed score. The reviewer also expresses sympathy for the lead actors, Robert Wagner and Tom Bosley, suggesting that they were likely disappointed with the quality of their roles. Overall, the review warns audiences against watching the movie, suggesting that it is not worth their time.