wen

🔍

question:You are a helpful assistant, who always provide explanation. Think like you are answering to a five year old. Tweet with a location You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more ||||| Tweet with a location You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more ||||| We've detected that JavaScript is disabled in your browser. Would you like to proceed to legacy Twitter? Yes ||||| Image copyright AP Image caption Witold Waszczykowski (left) met UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres. There are no known pictures of his meeting with officials from San Escobar. Do you know the way to San Escobar? Probably not, it doesn't exist, but that didn't stop Poland's foreign minister claiming to have had a productive meeting with its officials this week. Witold Waszczykowski told reporters he met with various nations for Poland's bid to join the UN security council, "such as Belize or San Escobar". Mr Waszczykowski has been roundly mocked on Twitter, the one place San Escobar does now exist, flag and all. He said that he had had meetings with officials from nearly 20 countries, including some Caribbean nations "for the first time in the history of our diplomacy. For example with countries such as Belize or San Escobar". He put the slip down to tiredness. "Unfortunately after 22 hours in planes and several connecting flights you can make a slip of the tongue," he said. He said he had in mind Saint Kitts and Nevis, a two-island Caribbean country known in Spanish as San Cristobal y Nieves. Twitter users responded in customary style, creating an official account and a flag for the island nation. One tweet said that San Escobar "fully supports Poland's candidacy to the Security Council". Another designed some currency, but added: "It's funny until you realise your only allies left are Belarus, Hungary and an imaginary nation state." ||||| Witold Waszczykowski derided on Twitter after talk of lobbying non-existent country as part of bid for UN security council seat Poland’s foreign minister has become the subject of online derision after he said he had met the representative of a non-existent country as part of Poland’s campaign to get a non-permanent seat on the UN security council. Witold Waszczykowski was in New York to lobby for a seat on the council from 2018-19. On Tuesday, he told reporters he had held meetings with officials from nearly 20 countries, including some Caribbean nations “for the first time in the history of our diplomacy”. He then gave examples of countries “such as Belize or San Escobar”. The latter, as many people were quick to point out, does not exist. A spokeswoman for the Polish foreign ministry said it had been a slip of the tongue and Waszczykowski was thinking of Saint Kitts and Nevis, a two-island Caribbean country known in Spanish as San Crisóbal y Nieves. San Escobar (@rpdsanescobar) #SanEscobar State Council introduces a visa-free regime with Poland, and a visa requirement for @SealandGov citizens, starting Jan 15th. But the statement did not prevent social media users from jumping on the gaffe. Using #SanEscobar, Twitter users made jokes and even invented a flag for San Escobar. A Facebook page adorned with maps and photographs of the imaginary country was set up, including pictures purportedly of work on a huge statue of Waszczykowski being built to honour his contribution to bilateral relations between the two countries. One account, called San Escobar, has been tweeting policies and landscape photos of the non-existent nation for the past day. Another posted a picture of a San Escobaran banknote featuring a picture of Jarosław Kaczyński, the leader of Poland’s governing party. Waszczykowski’s error brought to mind the 1933 Marx Brothers film Duck Soup, in which the tiny nation of Freedonia, “Land of the Brave, and Free”, suffers from severe financial problems and receives a loan from a wealthy widower to stay afloat. The term Freedonia has since been used to refer to fictional countries in popular culture. While working on Candid Camera, Woody Allen played a practical joke by asking passersby what they thought of the bid for independence for Freedonia. San Escobar (@rpdsanescobar) The magnificient Esperal Bay in #SanEscobar #VisitSanEscobar pic.twitter.com/QHE1c1DB4z In the 90s, satirical magazine Spy got several members of the US Congress to issue statements condemning ethnic cleansing in Freedonia, and in season six of political drama The West Wing, the character CJ Cregg wonders why Freedonia is left off a list of candidates for Nato membership. In reality, it is not unusual for politicians to stumble by making up names of places or inventing words. George W Bush was so adept at this that the term Bushism was devised to describe unconventional statements, pronunciations, malapropisms and linguistic errors in his speeches. Exen 🇵🇱 (@Exen) Little-known fact: bilateral meetings in #SanEscobar regularly go on for 48 and sometimes even 72 hours straight pic.twitter.com/upSKuXzSkt Ewa Lalik (@ewqaewqa) @rpdsanescobar here you go pic.twitter.com/s8s8UXkLqG Some claimed that during the televised debates with Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump had made up words such as braggadocious, but Merriam-Webster dictionary explained that it is “a dialectical word from 19th-century America” used to mean “the annoying or exaggerated talk of someone who is trying to sound very proud or brave”. The word is so seldom used in the 21st century that it does not have an entry in the dictionary, Merriam-Webster added. ||||| What is a one-paragraph summary of the above article?

answer:Poland's foreign minister, Witold Waszczykowski, received widespread ridicule after mistakenly referring to a nonexistent country, San Escobar, while discussing Poland's bid to join the UN security council. Waszczykowski had intended to mention the real country of Saint Kitts and Nevis. The slip drew laughter on social media, with users creating official accounts, flags, and even currency for the imaginary nation of San Escobar., Poland's foreign minister, Witold Waszczykowski, was made fun of on Twitter after saying he met with officials from a country called "San Escobar" while lobbying for a seat on the UN Security Council. The problem is, San Escobar doesn't exist! When people realized this, they started making jokes and even created a flag for the imaginary country. Waszczykowski later said it was a mistake, and he was actually thinking of Saint Kitts and Nevis, a real country in the Caribbean. But the jokes and the idea of San Escobar kept going on Twitter, with people inventing policies and creating pictures of this fake place.,A man named Witold Waszczykowski, who is from Poland and works as their foreign minister, made a funny mistake. He said he had a meeting with people from a country called "San Escobar," but that country doesn't really exist. He got confused because he was very tired from traveling, and he meant to say "Saint Kitts and Nevis," which is a real country in the Caribbean. People on the internet thought it was funny and made jokes about the imaginary country of San Escobar.

question:You are an AI assistant. Provide a detailed answer so user don’t need to search outside to understand the answer. Answer the following question: Here's a logic test: A paper plate has less resistance then a metal plate. This means a fish ball rolling across the _____ will move slower (A) paper plate (B) metal plate Choose the answer between "paper plate" and "metal plate". Answer:

answer:A fish ball rolling across a paper plate will move slower (Answer: paper plate). This is because a paper plate has less resistance, which means it has a higher friction surface, causing the fish ball to roll slower on it compared to a metal plate with less friction., The answer is (B) metal plate. The initial statement says that a paper plate has less resistance than a metal plate. This implies that a fish ball (or any object) would encounter more friction when rolling on a metal plate, which would slow it down more than if it were rolling on a paper plate.,Answer: The fish ball rolling across the "metal plate" will move slower. As a paper plate has less resistance than a metal plate, it means objects will move more smoothly and quickly on the paper plate compared to the metal plate, where the added resistance will cause the fish ball to move slower.

question:You are a helpful assistant, who always provide explanation. Think like you are answering to a five year old. Is Gopaidweekly.com a scam? Is Payme0.com a scam? Choose your answer. Are these two questions paraphrases of each other? OPTIONS: + no + yes

answer:No, these two questions are not paraphrases of each other. Gopaidweekly.com and Payme0.com are two different websites, and asking if one is a scam is not the same as asking about the other. It's important to check the legitimacy of each website individually, as their safety and trustworthiness may differ.,Gopaidweekly.com and Payme0.com are two different websites. So, the two questions are asking if each of these websites is a scam. The questions are not paraphrases of each other, because they are asking about two separate websites. + no,Both questions are asking if the websites Gopaidweekly.com and Payme0.com are scams or not, but they are asking about different websites. So, the answer to your question is: no, they are not paraphrases of each other, because they are asking about different websites.

question:You are an AI assistant. User will you give you a task. Your goal is to complete the task as faithfully as you can. While performing the task think step-by-step and justify your steps. Please answer the following question: What would be the ★-rating of this review (★ being the lowest and ★★★★★ being the highest)? "Bad Sick" A:

answer:In order to determine the ★-rating of the review "Bad Sick", I will consider various factors and break down the steps involved: 1. Analyze the keywords in the review: "Bad" - This term has a negative connotation, indicating dissatisfaction with the product or service. "Sick" - This word can be interpreted in two ways - it could mean the person felt unwell from the product or service, or it could be a colloquial expression for something being extremely good. Since we do not have more context, we cannot determine which interpretation would be accurate. 2. Make an assumption about the intended meaning: Considering that the term "bad" indicates dissatisfaction, I will assume that the reviewer meant "sick" in the sense of feeling unwell or having a negative experience. 3. Determine the rating based on the keywords: If both terms are negative, then the rating is quite likely to be on the lower end of the scale. However, since we do not have more context, we cannot accurately determine the exact rating. Based on these considerations, I would cautiously estimate the ★-rating of this review to be ★ to ★★, as it is negative but lacks enough information to conclusively determine its precise rating. An additional context would be necessary to determine the precise rating accurately.,★ Step 1: Identify the sentiment of the review. The review says "Bad Sick." This implies a negative sentiment towards the subject being reviewed. Step 2: Assign a rating based on the sentiment. Since the sentiment is negative, we will assign the lowest rating, which is ★., Based on the given review, "Bad Sick," it would be challenging to provide an accurate star rating as the review is quite vague and doesn't specify what product or service it's referring to. However, if I were to make an educated guess, I would give it a ★ or ★★ rating. Here's my reasoning: 1. "Bad" suggests dissatisfaction or poor quality, which typically warrants a lower rating. 2. "Sick" might imply that the reviewer experienced some adverse effects or issues, further justifying a lower rating. However, if the context were to change, such as the review being sarcastic or implying that the product or service was so awful it became entertaining, the rating might be higher. Nonetheless, based on the limited information provided, I would give it a ★ or ★★ rating.